The White West and the U.N. Definition of “Genocide”

The Holocaust and a More Broad Definition of Genocide

holocaust-oven

The end-all-be-all of genocide?

When I was in school, for about three grades (I’d say 9th, 10th, and 11th grade), we went through several gyrations of Holocaust education. From this miseducation, I always believed that “genocide” was more or less what happened in the Occupied Territories during the Second World War: people were rounded up, put behind barbed wire, gassed, and thrown in ovens.

However, it has become clear to me that Western governments (e.g. America, Britain, France, The Netherlands, and others in Europe), are engaged in an orchestrated campaign of genocide against their own people. I probably sound foolish for taking so long to come around to something so obvious, but sometimes it is hard to see a problem staring you right in the face.

Observe the definition of “genocide” below:

Genocide is defined in Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948) as:

¬†“any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part1; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”

(Read the full document here.)

A Better Voter

calais-migrants

They’ll vote for the “correct” people.

The weapon of choice for contemporary statecraft is demographic displacement by Third-World welfare leeches. Instead of the people shaping the government to pursue their interests, governments are shaping their people to pursue their own interests.

This very strategy is being pursued in Tibet at this very moment, where the Chinese government is importing colonists from the main Chinese ethnic group (Han people) into Tibet, in order to eventually breed out and exterminate the Tibetan people, forever.

In the West, all that is different is the people being imported. In Europe, huge numbers of Indians, Nigerians, Pakistanis, and Jamaicans were imported to vote for the Labour Party (though that might change since Brexit got passed). In The Netherlands, huge numbers of Muslim are imported. In Germany, Turks are imported as cheap labor. Canada imports Asians and (nowadays) Muslim refugees. In America, virtually every Third World ethnicity under the sun is imported, though Mexicans above all are favored.

It doesn’t matter if they have any skills, can speak English, will be a burden on the welfare system, have criminal records, have terrorist or organized crime connections, or are of good moral character. All that matters is that Mexicans, Somalians, blacks, and any other non-White ethnicity under the sun will vote Democrat.

You see friend, non-White, non-Asian people are the ideal voter. They have low IQ’s, high time preferences, and are generally low-information voters. They are impulsive and stupid, and easy to control. White people, on average, are like herding cats. A population of White people is too difficult for the managerial to state to handle, and so, white people have to go.

We are being demographically replaced by obsolete farm equipment.

What is the Solution?

Ideally, the immigration system would be gotten control of, and all Third-World immigration halted. New immigration would be restricted to skilled White persons of good moral character. The government would adopt a new attitude toward what Steve Sailer has called “affordable family formation”, where the government would actively take measures to ensure heterosexual white married couples could afford to have children. Divorce laws would be massively reformed, eliminating the financial risk of divorce for men. The government would adopt a more hostile attitude to women who become single mothers out of choice or accident. Only married couples would be permitted to draw water from the welfare well; single mothers get nothing. Under these circumstances, we would begin to see the White population share grow, and no longer be monotonically decreasing.

Splitting Up America

It is clear to me that the U.S. Constitution, despite a valiant effort, has failed in its efforts to control the pattern of long-term government growth. The managerial super-state needs a constant supply of dumb minority voters to keep itself installed in power. The government is now actively undertaking the destruction of the native White population in favor of other, more compliant races. Whether a Trump administration can fix the problem or not, I have no idea.

usa-regions

From FARK.

Ultimately, I believe the situation has gone too far to be salvage the United States in its current form. There is however, much to salvage. The best chance for racial peace is to split the country up into different racial enclaves, where each race would live in it own little territory. The results will be predictable: the white and Asian enclave would be prosperous and an advanced technological state, the black enclave would be a Third-World slumhole, and the Hispanic enclave a violent narco-state.

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

One thought on “The White West and the U.N. Definition of “Genocide”

  1. Pingback: On Capitalism and Race | unpropaganda

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s